Categories

Archives

A sample text widget

Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.

Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan. Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem, suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.

Hazelwood

The decision by the State Government in Victoria to reject abandonment of the Hazelwood Power station – probably the dirtiest in Australia from the viewpoint of emissions – is regrettable given that the Baillieu Government supported the closure move while in opposition. It shows that the Liberal Party is paying lip service to dealing with climate change – it wants the votes that would otherwise flow from their party if they expressed outright rejection of climate policy. The Coalition is a political party that cannot be trusted on climate.

The rejection is apparently based on cost. I’d be interested in getting some data on these costs.

Update: An executive from Hazelwood who previously worked for Alcoa has just been appointed the Victorian Government’s senior energy adviser.  It is a ridiculous appointment for any government to appoint someone who for years has acted as the mouthpiece for the states’s worst carbon polluters to now advise a government nominally (at least) committed to acting on climate change issues.

3 comments to Hazelwood

  • observa

    As I understand it Harry, forcing Hazelwood and the La Trobe valley power generators in general to wear an ETS previously outlined (and presumably a carbon tax now)would have seen them immediately declared bankrupt and handed back to their financiers (including Australia’s Big4 banks). That would immediately tear up long term pricing contracts, whereby the new owners could up prices significantly to recoup their loans, thereby tying Labor’s carbon taxes to significant power price hikes. Political poison which is why under the Rudd ETS it was proposed to dole out free carbon credits to the La trobe, something the Greens couldn’t wear and hence their vote against the ETS with the Coalition in the Senate.

    Presumably that’s still the fly in the CO2 ointment with the latest straight carbon tax regime, but perhaps that’s Gillard’s cunning plan. Groundhog day and sorry folks, but we tried our best, honest!

  • observa

    Robert Gottliebsen outlined the looming crisis back here-
    http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/A-colossal-infrastructure-disaster-pd20090715-TXU6A?OpenDocument&src=srch
    He also raised the long term maintenance/brownout problem for Labor with the ETS at that stage. Brownouts or power price hikes? The rock and the hard place for carbon taxing.

  • observa

    “It is a ridiculous appointment for any government to appoint someone who for years has acted as the mouthpiece for the states’s worst carbon polluters..”

    The new Vic Govt is simply challenging the Gillard Govt’s spin-

    http://www.businessspectator.com.au/bs.nsf/Article/carbon-tax-climate-change-Julia-Gillard-Greg-Combe-pd20110513-GT2FK?OpenDocument&src=kgb

Leave a Reply